O
Orclever
Back to Journal
Research Article Open AccessOrclever Native

Challenges in Maize Root Phenotyping: Preprocessing Limits and Class Imbalance in Deep Learning

Hüdanur Engin1,
Ali Murat Tiryaki2
1Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
2Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi
Received:Mar 12, 2026Revised:May 21, 2026Accepted:Jun 20, 2026Published:June 22, 2026

Abstract

Doubled Haploid (DH) technology significantly accelerates the development of homozygous lines in maize breeding; however, its scalability is constrained by the reliable discrimination of haploid and diploid individuals. The widely used R1-nj anthocyanin marker at the seed stage is susceptible to genetic suppression and environmental variability, leading to high misclassification rates. This limitation has driven a shift toward seedling root morphology as a more robust phenotypic marker, yet it introduces major challenges, including complex image noise and severe class imbalance. In this study, we systematically evaluate the limitations of standard computer vision pipelines and baseline deep learning models for root-based classification. Automated background removal methods (HSV, Rembg) are shown to misinterpret fine root hairs as noise, resulting in significant morphological data loss. Additionally, experiments conducted under a realistic class imbalance (1:5.4) demonstrate that widely used CNN architectures (ResNet50, VGG16, EfficientNetB0, DenseNet121) exhibit strong majority class bias, with haploid recall dropping to 0.00% and 27.7%. These findings reveal a critical limitation in existing approaches and highlight the need for domain-informed datasets and imbalance-aware learning strategies for robust and scalable AI-based maize breeding systems.
Keywords
Deep LearningClass ImbalanceImage PreprocessingMinority Class DetectionConvolutional Neural Networks (CNN)Root PhenotypingAgricultural Image Analysis

Full TextOpen Access

References

  1. 1.[1] Y. Altuntaş, Z. Cömert, and A. F. Kocamaz, "Identification of haploid and diploid maize seeds using convolutional neural networks and a transfer learning approach," Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 163, p. 104874, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.104874.
  2. 2.[2] B. W. Boote, D. J. Freppon, G. N. De La Fuente, T. Lübberstedt, B. J. Nikolau, and E. A. Smith, "Haploid differentiation in maize kernels based on fluorescence imaging," Plant Breed., vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 439-445, 2016. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12382.
  3. 3.[3] M. Buda, A. Maki, and M. A. Mazurowski, "A systematic study of the class imbalance problem in convolutional neural networks," Neural Networks, vol. 106, pp. 249-259, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.07.011.
  4. 4.[4] V. Chaikam, W. Molenaar, A. E. Melchinger, and P. M. Boddupalli, "Doubled haploid technology for line development in maize: technical advances and prospects," Theor. Appl. Genet., vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 3227-3243, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03433-x.
  5. 5.[5] D. Chicco and G. Jurman, "The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation," BMC Genomics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1-13, 2020. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7.
  6. 6.[6] A. Dermail, M. Mitchell, T. Foster, M. Fakude, Y. R. Chen, K. Suriharn, U. K. Frei, and T. Lübberstedt, "Haploid identification in maize," Front. Plant Sci., vol. 15, p. 1378421, 2024. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1378421.
  7. 7.[7] H. H. Geiger and G. A. Gordillo, "Doubled haploids in hybrid maize breeding," Maydica, vol. 54, no. 4, p. 485, 2009.
  8. 8.[8] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 770-778).
  9. 9.[9] Y. Ho and S. Wookey, "The real-world-weight cross-entropy loss function: Modeling the costs of misclassification," IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 4806-4813, 2019. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962617.
  10. 10.[10] Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017). Densely connected convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4700-4708).
  11. 11.[11] F. Kahrıman, A. M. Güz, and İ. Pehlivan, "Use of machine learning models-based image analysis to discriminate haploid and diploid seeds in maize," Sci. Agric., vol. 80, 2023. doi: 10.1590/1984-70332023v23n4a44.
  12. 12.[12] W. Liao, X. Wang, D. An, and Y. Wei, "Hyperspectral imaging technology and transfer learning utilized in identification of haploid maize seeds," Sensors, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 1167, 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1805.11784.
  13. 13.[13] J. Pace, N. Lee, H. S. Naik, B. Ganapathysubramanian, and T. Lübberstedt, "Analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) seedling roots with the high-throughput image analysis tool ARIA (Automatic Root Image Analysis)," PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 9, p. e108255, 2014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108255.
  14. 14.[14] M. P. Pound, J. A. Atkinson, A. J. Townsend, M. H. Wilson, M. Griffiths, A. S. Jackson, et al., "Deep machine learning provides state-of-the-art performance in image-based plant phenotyping," Gigascience, vol. 6, no. 10, p. gix083, 2017. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix083.
  15. 15.[15] B. M. Prasanna, V. Chaikam, and G. Mahuku, *Doubled Haploid Technology in Maize Breeding: Theory and Practice*. CIMMYT, 2012.
  16. 16.[16] T. Saito and M. Rehmsmeier, "The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets," PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 3, p. e0118432, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118432.
  17. 17.[17] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, "Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition," arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.
  18. 18.[18] Tan, M., & Le, Q. (2019). EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International conference on machine learning (pp. 6105-6114). PMLR.
  19. 19.[19] B. Veeramani, J. W. Raymond, and P. Chanda, "DeepSort: deep convolutional networks for sorting haploid maize seeds," BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1-10, 2018. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2267-2.
  20. 20.[20] X. Y. Wang, W. X. Liao, D. An, and Y. G. Wei, "Maize haploid identification via LSTM-CNN and hyperspectral imaging technology," arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09105, 2018.
  21. 21.[21] L. Zhang, D. Wang, J. Liu, and D. An, "Vis-NIR hyperspectral imaging combined with incremental learning for open world maize seed varieties identification," Front. Plant Sci., vol. 13, p. 893630, 2022. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.893630.

Article Sections

6/62,940 w
Download PDF
Cite This Article
Engin, H., Tiryaki, A. M. (2026). Challenges in Maize Root Phenotyping: Preprocessing Limits and Class Imbalance in Deep Learning . *The European Journal of Research and Development*, 6(1), ejrnd2026890477. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd2026890477

Bibliographic Info

JournalThe European Journal of Research and Development
Volume6
Issue1
Pages1–9
Article IDejrnd2026890477
PublishedJune 22, 2026
eISSN2822-2296

More from The European Journal of Research and Development