O
Orclever
Back to Journal
Research Article Open AccessOrclever Native

The Place of Cultural Economy in Development Policies of Developing Countries: Van Province

Gulcinay Basdogan Deniz1✉,
Zeynep Şirin Enlil2
1Iskenderun Technical University
2Yildiz Technical University
Published:June 7, 2022
DOI: 10.56038/ejrnd.v2i2.80
Vol. 2, No. 2

Abstract

Van city has serious socio-economic cultural development problems. Despite these problems, Van's cultural and natural diversity, as well as its potential to be an important commercial center due to its geopolitical situation, are important for the solution of extant problems. In this regard, this paper strives to examine the challenges of Van from the cultural aspect. Accordingly; in Van, the investments determined by the actors affecting the development and planning process periodically (2003-2016) were evaluated vis-à-vis the classification of cultural economy and human development index. Content analysis was used in the research. The European Union (EU) is one of the international actors in Van and the national actors are; Ministry of Development, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, T.C. Prime Ministry General Directorate of Foundations, Eastern Anatolia Project (EAP) Regional Development Administration, Eastern Anatolia Development Agency (EADA) and Municipalities. It is seen that these are important actors in development policies and the investments they have made coincide with the strategies they have targeted. International actors prioritize social and human development investments within the framework of EU regional development policies. National actors however followed both a development model within the scope of industry, trade and services, which was predominantly based on the economic perspective, and a development model from the tourism perspective in the services class. Consequently, it is seen that development in Van is not directly evaluated from the cultural view, but evaluated together with tourism, culture is instrumentalized for tourism and cultural tourism is brought to the fore and cultural policies are developed from the tourism perspective.

Keywords
developmenthuman developmentcultural economy and culture based urban strategiesactorsTurkeyVan

References

  1. 1.Eser, K. & Gökmen, Ç.E. (2009). Beşeri sermayenin ekonomik gelişme üzerindeki etkileri: dünya deneyimi ve Türkiye üzerine gözlemler. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 1(2), 41-56. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sobiadsbd/issue/11348/135612.Link
  2. 2.Manga, M. Bal, H. Algan, N. & Kandır, E.D. (2015). Beşeri sermaye, fiziksel sermaye ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: BRICS ülkeleri ve Türkiye örneği. Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences Journal, 24(1), 45-60. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/364819Link
  3. 3.Palabıyık, A. (2011). Pierre Bourdieu sosyolojisinde “habitus”, “sermaye” ve “alan” üzerine. Liberal Thought, 16 (61-61), 121- 141. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/liberal/issue/48171/609540.Link
  4. 4.Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. J. D. (2003). Answers for a reflective anthropology, Translated by Nazlı Ökten, İletişim Publications.
  5. 5.Gürses, D. (2009). Human development and Turkey. Balıkesir University Institute of Social Sciences Journal 12 (21), 339-350. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/baunsobed/issue/50238/647988.Link
  6. 6.Çetin, M. (2005). Human development in Turkey: a comparative assessment. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 19(2), 59-73.
  7. 7.Sen, A.K. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: the dewey lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy, 82 (4),169- 221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026184DOI
  8. 8.Dreze, J. & Sen, A. (1995). India: economic development and social opportunity. OUP.
  9. 9.Baliamoune-Lutz, M.N. (2004). On the Measurement of Human Well-Being: Fuzzy Set Theory and Sen’s Capability Approach. On the Measurement of Human Wellbeing: Fuzzy Set Theory and Sen's Capability Approach, WIDER Research Paper, No. 2004/16, The United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research (UNUWIDER), Helsinki. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/84633/1/rp2004-16.pdfLink
  10. 10.Gasper, D. (2000). Development as freedom: taking economics beyond commodities-the cautious boldness of Amartya Sen. Journal of International Development, 12(7), 989-1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1328(200010)12:7<989::AID-JID724>3.0.CO;2-QDOI
  11. 11.Birdman, K. (2006). The place of social capital in workers' physical and mental health, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Marmara University, Institute of Science and Technology.
  12. 12.Kangal, N. (2013). Theories of social capital and social capital development relationship: the case of Turkey. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Selçuk University, Institute of Social Sciences.
  13. 13.Dae-Bong, K. (2009). Human capital and its measurement, 3rd OECD World Forum on “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy” Charting Progress, Building Visions, Improving Life Busan, 27-30 October2009, Korea.
  14. 14.Yaylalı, M. & Lebe, F. (2011). An empirical analysis of the relationship between human capital and economic growth. Marmara University, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 30 (1), 23-53.
  15. 15.Rosenzweig, M.R. (2010). Microeconomic Approaches to Development: Schooling, Learning, and Growth, New Haven: Yale University Economic Growth Center, 2010: 1-16. https://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.24.3.81DOI
  16. 16.Nasir, Z. M. & Hina, N. (2000). Education and Earnings in Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Research Report No: 177. https://www.pide.org.pk/Research/Report177.pdf.Link
  17. 17.Çalışkan, S. Karabacak, M. & Meçik, O. (2013). Education and economic growth relationship in Turkey: 1923-2011 (a quantitative approach). Journal of Management Sciences 11(21), 29-48. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/comuybd/issue/4102/54039.Link
  18. 18.Qadri, F.S. (2011). Human capital and economic growth: tiem series evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Business Review, (1), 815-833. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30654/1/MPRA_paper_30654.pdf.Link
  19. 19.UNDP, (2015). United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Human Development Report, Abstract. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2015_human_development_report_0.pdf.Link
  20. 20.UNESCO, (2009). The 2009 Unesco Framework for Cultural Statistics (FCS). http://www.uis.unesco.org/culture/Documents/framework-cultural-statistics-culture-2009en.pdf.Link
  21. 21.Sitas, R. (2020). Cultural policy and just cities in Africa. City, (24), 3-4, 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2020.1782090DOI
  22. 22.United Nations, (2010). Creative Economy: A Feasible Development Option. Retrieved May 8, 2013 from http://www.undp.org.tr/publicationsDocuments/CER2010.pdf.Link
  23. 23.Gibson, C. & Kong, L. (2005). Cultural economy: a critical review. Progress in Human Geography, 29 (5), 541-561. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph567oaDOI
  24. 24.Pratt, A. C. (2009). Cultural economy. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. (2), 407-410.
  25. 25.DCMS, (1998). Creative industries mapping document.
  26. 26.Landry, C. (2000). The creative city: a toolkit for urban innovators. Earthscan.
  27. 27.Florida, R.L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it is transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books.
  28. 28.UNCTAD, (2008). Creative Economy Report. Retrieved May 10, 2013 from http://unctad.org/en/docs/ditc 20082cer_en.pdf.Link
  29. 29.Kaymas, S. (2020). Yaratıcı endüstriler, kültür temelli girişimcilik ve eleştirel ekonomi politik: kör noktayı yeniden düşünmek. İnsan ve İnsan, 7(26), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.782478DOI
  30. 30.Dörry, S. Rosol, M. & Thissen, F. (2016). The significance of creative industry policy narratives for Zurich's transformation toward a post-industrial city. Cities (58), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.022DOI
  31. 31.Aksoy, A. & Enlil, Z. (2011). Cultural economics inventory. İstanbul Bilgi University Publications.
  32. 32.Durmaz, B. (2012). Creative clusters and place‐making: analyzing the quality of place in Soho and Beyoğlu. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. The University of Nottingham, Department of Architecture and The Built Environment.
  33. 33.Evans, G. (2001). Cultural planning: an urban renaissance. Routledge.
  34. 34.Evans, G. & Shaw, P. (2004). The Contribution of culture to regeneration in the UK: a review of the evidence. UK: Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
  35. 35.Evans, G. (2005). Measure for measure: evaluating the evidence of culture’s contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6): 959 -983. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500107102DOI
  36. 36.Montgomery, J. (2004). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. part 2: a review of four cultural quarters in the UK, Ireland and Australia. Planning Practice & Research, 19(1), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/1561426042000215614DOI
  37. 37.Mommaas, H. (2004). Cultural clusters and the post-industrial city: towards the remapping of urban cultural policy. Urban Studies, 41(3), 507-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000178663DOI
  38. 38.Seisdedos, G. & Vaggione, P. (2005). The city branding processes: the case of Madrid, 41st ISoCaRP Congress 2005. http://www.isocarp.net/data/case_studies/658.pdfLink
  39. 39.Peker, A. F. (2006). The Role of Contemporary Art Museums in the Branding Process of the City: Urban Branding and Cultural Landmark, Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science and Technology.
  40. 40.Kavaratzis, M. & Ashworth, G.J. (2005). City branding: an effective assertion of identity or a marketing trick? tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 96(5), 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2005.00482.xDOI
  41. 41.Perry, B. Agerb, L. & Sitasc, R. (2020). Cultural heritage entanglements: festivals as integrative sites for sustainable urban development. International Journal Of Heritage Studies 2020, 26(6), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2019.1578987DOI
  42. 42.Jones, A. (2017). Regenerating urban waterfronts—creating better futures—from commercial and leisure market places to cultural quarters and innovation districts. Planning Practice & Research, 32(3), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2016.1222146DOI
  43. 43.Ferilli, G. Sacco, P.L. Blessi, G.T. & Forbici, S. (2017). Power to the people: when culture works as a social catalyst in urban regeneration processes (and when it does not). European Planning Studies, 25(2), 241–258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1259397DOI
  44. 44.Montgomery, J. (2003). Cultural quarters as mechanisms for urban regeneration. part 1: conceptualizing cultural quarters. Planning, Practice & Research, 18(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1561426042000215614DOI
  45. 45.Bianchini, F. & Parkinson, M. (1993). Cultural policy and urban regeneration: The West European experience. Manchester University Press.
  46. 46.Kim, J.Y. (2016). Cultural entrepreneurs and urban regeneration in Itaewon, Seoul. Cities (56), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.021DOI
  47. 47.Grodach, C. O'Connor, J. & Gibson, C. (2017). Manufacturing and cultural production: towards a progressive policy agenda for the cultural economy. City, Culture and Society (10), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.04.003DOI
  48. 48.Douglass, M. (2016). Creative communities and the cultural economy Insadong, chaebol urbanism and the local state in Seoul. Cities 856), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.09.007DOI
  49. 49.Ferilli, G. Sacco, P. L. & Tavano Blessi, G. (2012). Cities as creative hubs: from instrumental to functional values of culture-led local development. In L. F. Girard, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Sustainable city and creativity: Promoting creative urban initiatives (pp. 110–124). Ashgate.
  50. 50.EADA, (2015). Vision 2023: Van City and Districts Vision 2023 Common Mind Strategic Action Plan. http://www.daka.org.tr/panel/files/files/yayinlar/vizyon_2023 _van_eylem.pdf.Link
  51. 51.TUİK, (2021). Turkey Statistical Institute. Regional statistics. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/bolgeselistatistik/tabloOlustur.do#.Link
  52. 52.Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, (2), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001DOI
  53. 53.Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (1999). Doing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  54. 54.Merriam, S. B., and Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  55. 55.Baltacı, A. (2019). Nitel araştırma süreci: nitel bir araştırma nasıl yapılır? Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AEÜSBED), 5(2), 368-388. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299DOI
  56. 56.Başdoğan Deniz, G. & Enlil, Z. (2021). The importance of cultural economy in regional development policies: TRB2 Region and Van city. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education, (44), 235-252 . https://doi.org/10.32003/igge.886189DOI
  57. 57.Neuman, W. L. (2012). Toplumsal Araştırma Yöntemleri: Nicel ve Nitel Yaklaşımlar I-II. Cilt (5. Basım). Yayın Odası.
  58. 58.Karataş, Z. (2015). sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştirma yöntemleri. Sosyal Hizmet E-Dergi Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
  59. 59.Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
  60. 60.INTELI, (2011). Creative-based strategies in small and mediumsized cities: Guidelines for local authorities. Final output of the URBACT project “Creative Clusters in urban areas of low density”. INTELI Technical ActionPlan. http://urbact.eu/sites/default/files/import/Projects/Creative_Clusters/documents_media/URBACTCreativeClusters_TAP_INTELI_Final_01.pdf.Link
  61. 61.Mushkin, S.J. (1962). Health as an investment. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 70, No. 5, Part 2: 129-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/258730DOI
  62. 62.Schultz T.W., (1968). Education and economic growth: return to education, readings in the economics of education, UNESCO.
  63. 63.Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics (22), 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7DOI
  64. 64.Sab, R.S. & Smith S. (2001). Human capital: international evidence. IMF Working Paper, No. 32.
  65. 65.EAP, (2014). EAP Administration 2014 Annual Report, Erzurum.
  66. 66.EADA, (2015a). Eastern Anatolia Development Agency Support Programs. https://www.daka.org.tr/icerikler/destekturleri.Link
  67. 67.EAP, (2015). EAP Administration 2015 Annual Report, Erzurum.
Download PDF
Cite This Article
Deniz, G. B., Enlil, Z. Ş. (2022). The Place of Cultural Economy in Development Policies of Developing Countries: Van Province. *The European Journal of Research and Development*, 2(2), 352 - 382. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v2i2.80

Bibliographic Info

JournalThe European Journal of Research and Development
Volume2
Issue2
Pages352–382
PublishedJune 7, 2022
eISSN2822-2296
The Place of Cultural Economy in Development Policies of Developing Countries: Van Province | The European Journal of Research and Development