Flax fiber-reinforced composites may be a more environmentally friendly alternative to glass fiber-reinforced plastics for outdoor structures like water slides.
Researchers compared the mechanical and environmental performance of flax and glass fiber composites made using the L-RTM method. They found that flax fiber offers a sustainable solution due to its renewable nature, low density, and biodegradable properties. The study focused on the sensitivity of flax fiber composites to water and moisture, and discussed design considerations to mitigate these effects.
Abstract
The applicability of flax fiber-reinforced composites as an environmentally friendly alternative to glass fiber-reinforced plastics (GFRP), commonly used in outdoor structures such as water slides, has been investigated. While glass fiber is associated with high energy consumption and significant environmental impacts, flax fiber offers a sustainable solution due to its renewable nature, low density, and biodegradable properties. The mechanical and environmental performance of flax fiber-reinforced composites manufactured using the L-RTM (Light Resin Transfer Molding) method was evaluated, with a particular focus on sensitivity to water and moisture, and design considerations to mitigate these effects were discussed. In this method, L-RTM is employed as a vacuum-assisted, closed-mold technique particularly suited for medium-scale production of high-quality components with smooth surfaces on both sides. In this context, the essential conditions for natural fiber-reinforced composites to serve as a viable alternative to glass fiber in water slide applications have been identified.
References
- 1.Wambua, P., Ivens, J., & Verpoest, I. (2003). Natural fibers: Can they replace glass in fiber reinforced plastics? Composites Science and Technology, 63(9), 1259–1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00096-4DOI
- 2.Moudood, A., Rahman, A., Ochsner, A., Islam, M., & Francucci, G. (2019). Flax fiber and its composites: An overview of water and moisture absorption impact on their performance. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 38(7), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684419839874DOI
- 3.Composites One. (2020). Light RTM - Closed mold process. Composites One Technical Guides. https://www.compositesone.comLink
- 4.Easy Composites. (2021). Flax fibre reinforcement in composites – Advantages, disadvantages and processing. https://www.easycomposites.co.ukLink
- 5.Koronis, G., Silva, A., & Fontul, M. (2013). Green composites: A review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Composites Part B: Engineering, 44(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.004DOI
- 6.Yan, L., Chouw, N., & Jayaraman, K. (2014). Flax fibre and its composites – A review. Composites Part B: Engineering, 56, 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.014DOI
- 7.Holbery, M., & Houston, D. (2006). Natural-fiber-reinforced polymer composites in automotive applications. JOM, 58(11), 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-006-0234-2DOI