Optimization of Pultrusion Process Parameters for Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of key pultrusion process parameters—including temperature profile, fiber volume ratio (FVR), preformer geometry, resin viscosity, and line speed—on the production stability and mechanical performance of carbon fiber/epoxy composite profiles. Continuous carbon fiber rovings were impregnated with epoxy resin and processed through a multi-zone heated die under varying operating conditions. Tensile properties were evaluated in accordance with ASTM D3039 to ensure standardized and comparable mechanical characterization. Experimental observations revealed that even small adjustments in thermal management, heating zone positioning, preformer compression and eye diameter, fiber volume ratio, resin rheology, fiber type, squeezer configuration, and pulling speed produced significant variations in surface quality, flow behavior, resin backflow, fiber congestion, and overall process stability. The optimal process window was achieved at a line speed of 30–35 cm/min and an FVR range of 65–70%, with improved results obtained by shifting the initial heating zone backward, reducing the final preformer diameter, and utilizing lower-viscosity resin systems. The findings provide a comprehensive process–property relationship for carbon pultrusion and offer a practical guideline for industrial optimization aimed at achieving stable production and high-quality composite profiles.
References
- 1.Yesil, O. (2019). Investigation of the impact behavior of pultruded hybrid composite profiles. International Journal of Scientific and Technological Research, 5(5), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.7176/JSTR/5-5-04DOI
- 2.https://www.italcomposites.com/en/the-pultrusion-processLink
- 3.Pouchias, A. T. H. A. N. A. S. I. O. S., Maistros, G. E. O. R. G. E., Hartley, J. R., Loukodimou, V. A. S. I. L. I. K. I., Lewis, S. T. U. A. R. T., & Kazilas, M. C. (2020). High-performance pultrusion for Advanced composites. HIPPAC Project: Runcorn, UK.
- 4.Pommer, C., & Sinapius, M. (2020). Proof of concept for pultrusion control by cure monitoring using resonant ultrasound spectroscopy. Journal of Composites Science, 4(3), 115.
- 5.Jaklitsch, D. J., Bostic, M. T., & Pattie, E. R. (1991). An Examination of processing variables in the pultrusion of glass reinforcements with an epoxy-anhydride resin system (No. MTLTR9153).
- 6.Chachad, Y. R., Roux, J. A., Vaughan, J. G., & Arafat, E. (1995). Three-dimensional characterization of pultruded fiberglass-epoxy composite materials. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 14(5), 495-512.
- 7.Sumithra, G., Reddy, R. N., Kumar, G. D., Ojha, S., Jayachandra, G., & Raghavendra, G. (2023). Review on composite classification, manufacturing, and applications. Materials Today: Proceedings.
- 8.May, C. (Ed.). (2018). Epoxy resins: chemistry and technology. Routledge.
- 9.Chung, D. D. (1994). Carbon fiber composites. Butterworth-Heinemann.
- 10.Poppe, N., Wilhelm, M., & Kärger, L. (2023). Pultrusion Process Simulation-Modelling of the Injection and Impregnation Chamber. In Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Composite Materials.
- 11.Konstantopoulos, S., Fauster, E., & Schledjewski, R. (2014). Monitoring the production of FRP composites: A review of in-line sensing methods. Express Polymer Letters, 8(11).
Demir, S., Alkan, Ö. (2025). Optimization of Pultrusion Process Parameters for Carbon Fiber/Epoxy Composites. *The European Journal of Research and Development*, 5(1), 212-227. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v5i1.672
Bibliographic Info