Pressure-Controlled Runner Optimization and Filling Balance Analysis in Multi-Cavity Injection Molds
Abstract
In this study, the effects of runner-system design on filling balance and pressure distribution in multi-cavity injection molds were investigated through Moldex3D simulations. Four runner configurations—H-type, Symmetrical-type, Star-type, and Fishbone-type—were evaluated using the material SCHULAMID® 6 MV14 FR4 K1681. The simulation results revealed that runner geometry has a decisive influence on filling uniformity, and they further demonstrated the effectiveness of a pressure-controlled runner approach in improving overall product quality. The findings highlight the importance of rheology-based optimization in runner-system design. This study differentiates itself from previous research by providing a comparative analysis of multiple runner types and by demonstrating that balanced filling can be successfully achieved not only in molds with 2ⁿ cavity counts but also in intermediate cavity numbers such as 12 and 14. The rheology-based pressure-controlled methodology presented here introduces a new optimization perspective for multi-cavity injection mold design.
References
- 1.Bajracharya, R. M., Manalo, A. C., Karunasena, W., & Lau, K. T. (2016). Experimental and theoretical studies on the properties of injection moulded glass fibre reinforced mixed plastics composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 84, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.02.025DOI
- 2.Strong, B. (1999). Plastics: Materials and processing (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
- 3.Beaumont, J. P. (2004). Runner and gating design handbook (3rd ed., p. 15). Hanser. (ISBN: 1569903476)
- 4.Yang, S.-Y., Huang, T.-C., Huang, P.-H., & Ko, T.-Y. (2008). Study on flow imbalance during filling a multi-cavity mold using H-type runners. Key Engineering Materials, 364–366, 1306–1311.
- 5.Abdullahi, A. A., Choudhury, I. A., & Azuddin, M. (2016). Effect of runner dimensions on cavity filling in microinjection moulding for defect-free parts. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11, 7788–7793.
- 6.Tsai, H.-H., Wu, S.-J., Liu, J.-W., Chen, S.-H., & Lin, J.-J. (2022). Parameters toward filling balance for multi-cavity molds in polyvinyl chloride injection molding. Polymers, 14(17), 3483. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173483DOI
- 7.Protolabs. (2024). Multi-cavity injection molding design guidelines. https://www.protolabs.com/services/injection-molding/family-multi-cavity/Link
- 8.Zhu, J., Qiu, Z., Huang, Y., & Huang, W. (2021). Overview of injection molding process optimization technology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1798, Article 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1798/1/012042DOI
- 9.Wilczyński, K., & Narowski, P. (2020). A strategy for solving filling imbalance in geometrically balanced injection molds. Polymers, 12(4), 805. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040805DOI
- 10.Altan, M. (2010). Reducing shrinkage in injection molding using Taguchi, ANOVA, and neural network methods. Materials & Design, 31(1), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.049DOI
- 11.Wu, H., Wang, Y., & Fang, M. (2021). Study on injection molding process simulation and process parameter optimization for automotive indicator light guide support. Advanced Materials Science and Engineering, 2021, 1–13.
- 12.Alafaghani, A. A., & Qattawi, A. (2018). Investigating the effect of fused deposition modeling process parameters using the Taguchi design of experiment method. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 36, 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.025DOI
Çalık, M. F., Karaeli, C. G. (2025). Pressure-Controlled Runner Optimization and Filling Balance Analysis in Multi-Cavity Injection Molds. *The European Journal of Research and Development*, 5(1), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.56038/ejrnd.v5i1.720
Bibliographic Info